Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 222  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout

   Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 192-194  

Titanium particles in tissues from peri-implant mucositis: An exfoliative cytology-based pilot study


1 Department of Periodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Periodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, Telangana, India

Date of Submission31-May-2016
Date of Acceptance03-Nov-2017
Date of Web Publication16-Jan-2018

Correspondence Address:
Pamidimarri Sai Divya Gayatri
Department of Periodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda - 508 254, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_184_16

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: To evaluate the presence of titanium particles in the peri-implant mucosa of unloaded single implants. Materials and Methods: Forty participants with single unloaded implants were selected. They were divided equally into two groups: Group 1 with mild and Group 2 with moderate-to-severe peri-implant mucositis. Cytologic smears of peri-implant mucosa were obtained using cytobrush during second-stage surgery. Results: Study states that 60% of participants of Group 2 were positive for titanium particles in peri-implant cytology. Conclusion: This study concludes that the titanium particles might be the initiators of the inflammation around implant.

Keywords: Corrosion, cytology, dental implant, mucosa, titanium


How to cite this article:
Penmetsa SL, Shah R, Thomas R, Kumar AB, Gayatri PS, Mehta DS. Titanium particles in tissues from peri-implant mucositis: An exfoliative cytology-based pilot study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2017;21:192-4

How to cite this URL:
Penmetsa SL, Shah R, Thomas R, Kumar AB, Gayatri PS, Mehta DS. Titanium particles in tissues from peri-implant mucositis: An exfoliative cytology-based pilot study. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2022 Aug 15];21:192-4. Available from: https://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2017/21/3/192/222565


   Introduction Top


Titanium is considered to be the metal of choice for oral and maxillofacial and orthopedic implants. It is mainly opted owing to its high strength and inertness. It is a highly reactive metal which develops a passivating layer of titanium dioxide (TiO2) over its surface on exposure to air or fluids. This layer forms the interface between the biological milieu and the implant. It is responsible for biocompatibility by decreasing the material reactivity and partially preventing corrosion.[1] Commercially pure titanium and extra low interstitial Ti-6Al-4V alloy are the most common titanium-based implant biomaterials.[2] Loss of TiO2 layer without reformation could lead to corrosion similar to the other base metals.[3] In the oral environment, titanium is subjected to conditions of varying pH, due to inflammatory or other processes that can turn the medium acidic, active dissolution of metal ions can occur upon exposure of the bulk metal.[4],[5] The normal rate of corrosion of titanium is 0.13 mm/year, which is quite acceptable for a noble biomaterial.[5]

Limited literature is available demonstrating the corrosion of titanium in vivo. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of titanium particles in patients with and without peri-implantitis using exfoliative cytology.[6],[7] To the best of our knowledge, no studies were conducted to demonstrate the presence of titanium particles in mucosa of peri-implant mucositis. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the presence of titanium in the peri-implant mucosa of patients having single implants and compare its presence among the mild with moderate-to-severe groups of peri-implant mucositis patients.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study protocol was presented in the Institutional Review Board, and permission was obtained for conducting the same (vide Ref. No. BDC/Exam/84/2014–2015). The selection criteria included forty nonsmoking male and female participants with good general health and oral hygiene within the age group of 35–45 years. Participants with single healthy titanium implants wherein the gingival former was placed 4–6 months after the implant insertion were included in the study.[8] The implants selected for this present study belonged to Nobel Biocare ® system Replace CC type, Switzerland. The dimensions of the implants selected were dependent on the residual ridge quality, which varied from patient to patient. However, participants with oral piercings, metallic prosthesis, or metal restorations on neighboring teeth and those undergoing orthodontic therapy were excluded from this study.

Informed consent was obtained from the participants before the commencement of the study. The screening and diagnosis of participants with single implant was made based on a modified gingival index (MGI) given by Lobene et al., 1986.[9] All the selected participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 mild gingivitis (n = 20) - MGI of each single implant in the range of 0.1–1 and Group 2 moderate-to-severe gingivitis (n = 20) - MGI of each single implant in the range of 1.1–3. Before the final impression, the gingival former was removed and using a cytobrush, exfoliate cytological samples of the peri-implant mucosa were collected at the level of union of the sulcular epithelium and the oral epithelium. The cytological smears obtained were spray fixed and stained using the Papanicolaou method. The smears were then mounted on the microscope slides and analyzed under transmitted light microscopy in six fields per slide by a single experienced oral pathologist. The presence of metal-like opaque particulate aggregates was identified, as the corrosion products of the titanium implants.


   Results Top


[Table 1] presents the prevalence of titanium particles in peri-implant soft tissues in both the groups. Comparison of the presence of titanium particles in the two groups was made using Fisher's exact test. In the present study, titanium particles were found in the peri-implant soft tissues of 12 out of 40 patients, and all of them were in moderate-to-severe gingivitis group. The rest of the smears appeared to be normal in nature [Figure 1]a, [Figure 1]b.
Table 1: Group-wise distribution of presence/absence of titanium particles in peri-implant mucosa

Click here to view
Figure 1: (a) Papanicolaou stained cytosmears demonstrating the presence of squamous epithelial cells representing a normal cytological smear; (b) Papanicolaou stained cytosmears demonstrating the presence of squamous epithelial cells with the presence of metal particular aggregates (pointed using arrows) with in few cells. Few inflammatory cells along with debris were also evident

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Titanium has proven to be a revolutionary material of choice in implant dentistry since the last 50 years. This could be attributed to its excellent biocompatibility and inert behavior. However, in the recent years, studies have demonstrated the presence of titanium particles in peri-implant mucosa.[6],[7] The pH of saliva is also known to influence the corrosion rate of these titanium particles.[10] The exact nature of these particles whether inert or not remains to be established. Furthermore, the presence of these particles in different severities of inflammation has not been studied. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind in evaluating the titanium particulate corrosion in stages of peri-implant mucositis.

In the present study, titanium particles in peri-implant tissue were demonstrated in 60% of participants categorized under Group 2 while none were identified in Group 1. This could be attributed to the inflammatory cell infiltrate-like macrophages.[11] Cytotoxicity has been demonstrated in osteoblast cell cultures exposed to metallic wear debris, although the metal ion concentrate, the ions within bone in vivo have not been established. It has been hypothesized that these titanium particles in systemic implants act like foreign bodies and may provoke the inflammatory responses leading to bone resorption. In the presence of metal ions, osteoblasts are able to release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as transforming growth factor beta 1, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 β), and most commonly, IL-6 into the microenvironment. These cytokines can, in turn, activate the differentiation of preosteoclasts into mature bone resorbing cells.[12] A review on the loosening of peri-prosthetic total joint replacements stated that the preosteoclasts, secreted as a result of wear particles in joint replacement implants, would lead to osteolysis, namely “aseptic osteolysis.” This leads to loosening of the implant and poses a severe challenge and impact on peri-implant mucosal health.[13] Similarly, titanium corrosion from dental implants in the oral cavity might also lead to loosening of dental implants by “aseptic osteolysis.” Extensive literature search has been done, and no study has been done regarding this phenomenon in intraoral implants. Although the present study does neither quantify the amount of titanium leached in response to corrosion nor its ability in igniting inflammation but invites further prospective studies in this aspect for proving the same.

Studies demonstrating the presence of titanium particles in vivo are present in literature. However, whether they remain inert or initiate any inflammatory responses is still yet to be proven. These particles may also bind to the proteins and could get disseminated to distant organs systemically through vascular and lymphatic channels.[14] However, the interactions of these particles at distant organs are not established.

Within the limitations of our study, it can be concluded that the incidence of titanium particles in the peri-implant soft tissue increases with an increase in clinical inflammation. Further studies should be designed to probe the rate of particle release in response to several factors, with their role in the progression of peri-implant disease. Long-term studies with larger sample size are required to establish the role of peri-implant titanium particles.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Guglielmotti MB, Domingo MG, Steimetz T, Ramos E, Paparella ML, Olmedo DG. Migration of titanium dioxide microparticles and nanoparticles through the body and deposition in the gingiva: An experimental study in rats. Eur J Oral Sci 2015;123:242-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Flatebø RS, Johannessen AC, Grønningsaeter AG, Bøe OE, Gjerdet NR, Grung B, et al. Host response to titanium dental implant placement evaluated in a human oral model. J Periodontol 2006;77:1201-10.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chaturvedi TP. An overview of the corrosion aspect of dental implants (titanium and its alloys). Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:91-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Rodrigues DC, Valderrama P, Wilson TG, Palmer K, Thomas A, Sridhar S, et al. Titanium corrosion mechanisms in the oral environment: A Retrieval study. Materials (Basel) 2013;6:5258-74.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shah R, Penmetsa DSL, Thomas R, Mehta DS. Titanium corrosion: Implications for dental implants. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016;24:171-80.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Olmedo DG, Nalli G, Verdú S, Paparella ML, Cabrini RL. Exfoliative cytology and titanium dental implants: A pilot study. J Periodontol 2013;84:78-83.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Smith AT, Ma S, Siddiqi A, Duncan WJ, Girvan L, Hussaini HM. Titanium particles in peri-implant tissues: Surface analysis and histologic response. Clin Adv Periodontics 2012;2:232-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Lobene RR, Mankodi SM, Ciancio SG, Lamm RA, Charles CH, Ross NM. Correlations among gingival indices: A methodology study. J Periodontol 1989;60:159-62.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Barão VA, Mathew MT, Assunção WG, Yuan JC, Wimmer MA, Sukotjo C. Stability of cp-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V alloy for dental implants as a function of saliva pH – An electrochemical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1055-62.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Olmedo D, Fernández MM, Guglielmotti MB, Cabrini RL. Macrophages related to dental implant failure. Implant Dent 2003;12:75-80.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sansone V, Pagani D, Melato M. The effects on bone cells of metal ions released from orthopaedic implants. A review. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2013;10:34-40.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Abu-Amer Y, Darwech I, Clohisy JC. Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: Mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies. Arthritis Res Ther 2007;9 Suppl 1:S6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Olmedo DG, Tasat D, Guglielmotti MB, Cabrini RL. Titanium transport through the blood stream. An experimental study on rats. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:1099-103.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Recent developments of biomaterial scaffolds and regenerative approaches for craniomaxillofacial bone tissue engineering
Shravanya Gundu, Neelima Varshney, Ajay Kumar Sahi, Sanjeev Kumar Mahto
Journal of Polymer Research. 2022; 29(3)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Effects of titanium dioxide microparticles and nanoparticles on cytoskeletal organization, cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation in human gingival fibroblasts in the presence of lipopolysaccharide
Lei Li, Wei Sun, Jian Yu, Wenlong Lei, Hao Zeng, Bin Shi
Journal of Periodontal Research. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Electrical Potentiometry with Intraoral Applications
Alfonso Jornet-García, Arturo Sanchez-Perez, José María Montoya-Carralero, María José Moya-Villaescusa
Materials. 2022; 15(15): 5100
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Effects of Titanium Corrosion Products on In Vivo Biological Response: A Basis for the Understanding of Osseointegration Failures Mechanisms
Claudia Cristina Biguetti, Franco Cavalla, Angélica Cristina Fonseca, Andre Petenucci Tabanez, Danyal A. Siddiqui, Sutton E. Wheelis, Rumio Taga, Walid D. Fakhouri, Renato Menezes Silva, Danieli C. Rodrigues, Gustavo Pompermaier Garlet
Frontiers in Materials. 2021; 8
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Corrosion of titanium under simulated inflammation conditions: clinical context and in vitro investigations
M. Prestat, D. Thierry
Acta Biomaterialia. 2021; 136: 72
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone
Gabrielle Alencar Ferreira Silva, Fernanda Faot, Anna Paula da Rosa Possebon, Wander José da Silva, Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2021; 119: 104515
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Real Appearance of Dendritic Cell on Failed Implant Fixture
Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen, Mi Young Eo, Soung Min Kim
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2021; 32(7): e607
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Preclinical In Vitro Assessment of Submicron-Scale Laser Surface Texturing on Ti6Al4V
Luiz Schweitzer, Alexandre Cunha, Thiago Pereira, Kerstin Mika, Ana Maria Botelho do Rego, Ana Maria Ferraria, Heinz Kieburg, Sven Geissler, Eckart Uhlmann, Janosch Schoon
Materials. 2020; 13(23): 5342
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 A Comprehensive Review on the Corrosion Pathways of Titanium Dental Implants and Their Biological Adverse Effects
Júlio C. M. Souza, Karin Apaza-Bedoya, Cesar A. M. Benfatti, Filipe S. Silva, Bruno Henriques
Metals. 2020; 10(9): 1272
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Are Titania Photocatalysts and Titanium Implants Safe? Review on the Toxicity of Titanium Compounds
Agata Markowska-Szczupak, Maya Endo-Kimura, Oliwia Paszkiewicz, Ewa Kowalska
Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(10): 2065
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2825    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded198    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 10    

Recommend this journal