Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 1335  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout


 
   Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 70-74  

Use of alternative communication with pictures for outpatient periodontal treatment in fragile X syndrome patients


1 Discipline of Periodontics and Dental Care for Patients with Special Needs, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
2 Anhanguera University, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
3 Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Date of Submission27-Apr-2019
Date of Decision06-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance14-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication21-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Rafael Ferreira
Avenida Costa e Silva, Sem Número, Bairro: Universitário, Campo Grande, MS
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_257_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


The purpose of this article is to discuss the clinical management and behavior during periodontal treatment in two patients with fragile X syndrome (FXS) using alternative communication with pictures (ACP). Both patients had a history of previous dental care only possible under general anesthesia. The ACP was used to anticipate the activities to be carried out, promoting ambiance, improving the professional–patient communication, and decreasing the stress of the patient. It was possible to carry out outpatient care without oral sedation and containment/physical restraint in both patients, being surpassed the communicative and behavioral difficulties. These case reports allow us to re-think dental care under general anesthesia or other invasive methods for patients with FXS. Therefore, the ACP is an important mediator tool that can facilitate the insertion and the management of patients with FXS, allowing the dental care outpatient clinic to promote oral health and quality of life for these patients, improving adherence to periodontal treatment and the periodontal maintenance for oral hygiene.

Keywords: Alternative communication, communication disorders, fragile X syndrome, periodontal maintenance


How to cite this article:
Ferreira R, Zink AG, da Silva Santos PS. Use of alternative communication with pictures for outpatient periodontal treatment in fragile X syndrome patients. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2021;25:70-4

How to cite this URL:
Ferreira R, Zink AG, da Silva Santos PS. Use of alternative communication with pictures for outpatient periodontal treatment in fragile X syndrome patients. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 20];25:70-4. Available from: https://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2021/25/1/70/295642




   Introduction Top


Fragile X syndrome (FXS), also known as Martin–Bell syndrome, is a hereditary disorder of development linked to the X chromosome.[1] There is a change next to the final third of the long arm of this chromosome,[2] which gives an appearance of “fragile.”[3] This occurs in the region of the fragile X mental retardation-1 gene.[4] It presents repetitions (between 56 and 200 repetitions)[5] of trinucleotide (cytosine-guanine-guanine),[6],[7] leading to the silencing[4] and the almost complete loss of protein (fragile X mental retardation protein).[8]

FXS is the most frequent cause of intellectual disability due to heredity, and estimates suggest a frequency between one in 1250–4500 in men and one in 2500–9000 in women.[9],[10],[11],[12] Most of the individuals with this syndrome have behavioral manifestations as well as other variables, including attention deficits, hyperactivity, impulsivity, anxiety, the behavior of self-aggression, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).[13]

The behavioral issues promote a dental care complex,[14],[15] with the deficient and / or absent communication in these patients.[15] In this case, one of the options for dental care is to submit the patient for general anesthesia.[16] These difficulties of communication mean that these patients have less access to the dentist, which can result in worse dental conditions with subsequent loss of teeth.[17],[18],[19]

However, behavioral approaches to promote and develop an alternative communication, as with the Treatment and Education of Autistic and related Communication-handicapped children (TEACCH®),[20] Son-Rise® Program,[21] and Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS®),[22] are promising methods of intervention in patients with ASD. During dental care, these strategies can facilitate patient–professional contact[23] and allow dental care ambulatory.[23],[24]

The use of alternative communication with pictures (ACP) in dentistry for patients FXS was not reported in literature so far. Therefore, the aim of this article is reporting the clinical and behavioral management in the outpatient periodontal treatment of two patients with FXS using ACP with the support of parents and/or caregivers according to CARE guidelines for case reports.[25]


   Case Report Top


The following shall be dealt with clinical data, medical and dental history, as well as the clinical management of two patients with FXS treated in outpatient clinics [Table 1]. Before any procedure, parents/guardians of the patients were instructed about the actions involving the dental treatment, and they signed a term of free and informed consent and authorization for the publication of clinical data in this study.
Table 1: Characteristics of the patients in this study

Click here to view


The use of ACP adapted to dental treatment, and subsequent periodontal maintenance, was selected for treatment and intervention for both patients. The augmentative and alternative communication is a form used for patients with different degrees and levels of communication impairment, such as among them people with ASD.[26] It is an alternative communication because it is another option of communication and augmentative communication because it can increase the communicative repertoire.[26]

Zink et al.[23] initially described the use of alternative communication in dentistry, where pictures were used to anticipate the result of dental treatment of people with ASD. This communication strategy is to encourage the treatment in an outpatient environment by minimizing the use of physical restrictions, sedation, and forwarding for assistance under general anesthesia, promoting greater frequency of outpatient care and decreasing the indication and the queues for treatment at the hospital level. Zink et al.[23] found that the anticipation using images favors the acceptance and understanding of dental treatment for a person with ASD.

In clinical cases reported, we opted for choices involving the use of pictures associated with dental procedures,[23] which consist of the following three parts.

First part

Preparation of the images: Images can be either photograph, as pictures and/or pictograms (representations of objects and concepts translated into a graphical form extremely simplified), addressing the dental context. For example, it was represented at low speed along with the brush of Robinson as a reference to professional prophylaxis. Presentation of dental instruments, such as the triple syringe, high-speed dental handpiece, clinical mirror, exploratory probe, gloves and others. The pictures from the dental office, as with images of the dental chair, reflectors and a photograph of the dentist with and without a mask, images of dental auxiliaries, were obtained. These images can be plasticized or pasted on another role (such as a card). Velcro® can be added or magnets to facilitate the handling by parents and/or caregivers and also by the patient.

Second part

The pictures are given to parents and/or caregivers. They are instructed on how to set up a panel of routine to the patient (also a panel of daily activities). These pictures can be present on a panel as a photo album, attached to a metallic structure (in the case of magnets), or in electronic devices (cell phones or tablets). Pictures were presented to anticipate each procedure: initially, sit in the chair, open the mouth, high-speed dental handpiece, anesthesia, and isolation of the operative field.

Nevertheless, this does not mean that you must submit all images in all consultations; in most cases, the skills learned do not need to be presented. The whole image must be complemented with verbal information and positive reinforcement (stimulation) by parents on the way to the dental office. This procedure should be done in the day and on the eve of care dental care. The positive reinforcement should be motivated with words such as “very good!”

Third part

Complementation with visual support (talk-show-do). The patient can take the images on the day of dental care. The dentist can show the physical object, such as the triple syringe among others, to facilitate the understanding of the relation of images with the context. The dentist needs to observe if the patient is associating the specific object in the image displayed, i.e., if he/she believes that by showing the image of the chair, the patient understands that it is the dental chair where you need to sit down. If you do not understand, you will need to strengthen the image to the concrete object.

To check if there is evolution/adoption of the proposed treatment with the use of ACPs, a scale was used in the reported cases to assess the behavior of the patients' faces in different situations during clinical practice.[27]

In both cases, 13 items were evaluated that correspond to the actions of communicative intent and interaction with the dentist during the dental treatment: scores of 0, 1, and 2 were applied when the patient did not present any action/reaction (score 0), or restricted way (score 1), or clear (score 2). Each patient could have a minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 26 points: the values close to zero show great loss of communication, whereas those close to 26 imply greater understanding by the patient.

These data were collected in the first consultation and after three consultations for patient 1 (P1) and two consultations for patient 2 (P2), using this interval for alternative communication [Table 2].
Table 2: Observation of communicative behavior during dental care

Click here to view


We observed an exponent growth in communication, especially with P2. The use of pictures enabled better expression and interaction with the patients, mainly for acceptance of the activities proposed by the professional and reduction in anxiety to a signal (exchange of shifts). The pictures promoted anticipation of activities and envied the patient with the context of the treatment and dental environment, improving the interaction with the dentist. the patient 2 had improved gestural reproduction (mimicry) after using the ACP, and such movements are important for the assimilation of hygiene and periodontal treatment at home. P1 had initially scored 6 and after the use of the ACP, scored 19, and P2 had an initial score of 2 which rose to 16 after the use of the GPA.

However, the use of the ACP has proved to be effective for the development of dialogs and also for the understanding of abstract thinking, possessing a low effect on verbal communication (such as the production of words or phrases in preparation) for both patients. This is in agreement with the objective of this ACP form. Therefore, outpatient treatment was possible with periodontal maintenance to promote oral health for both patients.

Despite the various benefits of using the ACP, some limitations of this case report were as follows: there is a need for parental/caregiver support to reinforce alternative communication at home. Depending on the cognitive capacity of the patient, more or fewer consultations may be required to adapt to the ACP. Even in patients with advanced degrees of intellectual disability or early / high age, the use of ACP can promote benefits, as evidenced by a systematic review in preschoolers and ASD children.[22] More clinical trials are necessary to elucidate better how ACP should be addressed during dental treatment in an outpatient clinic.[23]


   Discussion Top


FXS is one of the genetic changes that most often leads to cognitive impairment, which can affect and derail outpatient dental care. FXS patients may have behavioral manifestations that are also compatible with ASD.[13] The use of ACP promoted an exponential growth in the degree of understanding and communication in both cases [Table 2], being that P1 presented an evolution of 316% and P2 of 800%. These data signaled a satisfactory resolution of the clinical cases that allowed dental care and periodontal maintenance in an outpatient clinic, which was possible only in the surgical center previously.

The use of communication with a picture can be used for any person with changed cognitive development.[26] However, for some patients, especially those that require more concrete references, it may be necessary to associate visual support or physical contact to allow the assimilation with the object or with the situation to be presented, for example, the dental care context. The complementation with the use of the technique speak-show-do helps in clinical management and shows great additional benefits to the use of alternative communication with the images.[23] It should be emphasized that individuals with higher cognitive ability are adhering more quickly to the understanding of images.[28] This is one of the difficulties that may be encountered from a lack of interest or understanding of the image by the patient. Each person with ASD is unique, and the difficulties will have to be analyzed individually and new strategies to approach should be outlined.[23] A barrier that can be developed is the nonmembership of this communication strategy by parents, and this should be analyzed with caution because it may prevent/hinder the achievement of periodontal treatment.

With the use of ACP as a strategy of dental approach, it is expected to improve the communication between professionals and patients, decreasing anxiety through the predictability (anticipation of facts). This anticipation employing pictures makes the action more predictable, and patients can adopt it into the daily routine,[23] assisting in the implementation of the outpatient periodontal treatment.

Other professionals who maintain contact with the patient (such as speech pathologists, psychologists, and occupational therapists) can also assist in anticipation for a visit to the dentist, inserting activities that relate to dentistry in the eve of dental care, for example. FXS patients may present ASD characteristics, which necessitates multidisciplinary treatment that also works with the development of an alternative communication. Therefore, the predictability of acceptance and development by individuals with this form of communication is favorable.

We have demonstrated that the use of ACP during outpatient periodontal treatment was effective for patients with FXS. The dental biofilm control of patients with FXS is a clinical challenge and should be the focus of future work. During periodontal maintenance, measures for effective control of biofilms are extremely important for these patients. A systematic review did not demonstrate the superiority of electric toothbrush over manual toothbrush (for people with disabilities in general),[29] and modified brushes and chlorhexidine (in concentrations of 0.12% or 0.2% as mouthwashes and/or spray) are more effective than conventional brushes and placebos.[30] For the mechanical control of dental biofilm, a toothbrush with three heads can be more effective instead of a single head.[31] For all these steps, the ACP can be used.

The initial approach through ACP in public health and health supplement points to be a problem-solving strategy and proposes to reduce costs and risks associated with surgical periodontal treatment in surgical centers under general anesthesia. However, further studies that prove the effectiveness of this technique, as well as the development of other tools for integration and inclusion of the patient with a drip in outpatient periodontal treatment and periodontal maintenance, are needed.

Implications for research

The use of ACP during periodontal care in a patient with FXS can be a broad field of research:

  1. Another syndrome may be considered and applied to the treatment of other dental needs
  2. Assessing the impact of such treatment on private practices and the public network maybe the target of future studies
  3. New research is also suggested that can optimize both the use of ACP and also the periodontal care of patients with FXS.


Implications for clinical practice

The ACP approach during patient care with FXS allows several benefits in clinical practice, such as:

  1. Favors the reception and makes the periodontal treatment of these patients feasible
  2. Avoids performing periodontal procedures (as with other dental needs) in the operating room for patients with FXS or other disabilities
  3. Promotes oral health and quality of life for patients with FXS from nonsurgical periodontal treatment in an outpatient setting
  4. Expands the strategies of periodontists to care for patients with cognitive deficits, such as patients with FXS.



   Conclusions Top


We conclude that the use of ACP led to dental care and periodontal treatment in an outpatient clinic for patients with FXS and ASD, even with a history of dental care at the surgical center under general anesthesia by their behavioral changes. This form of behavioral interventions is a viable and satisfactory alternative for outpatient periodontal treatment. it is a low-cost method that favors acceptance and adherence of patient's and promotes success in the preventive and curative treatment.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients/parents have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients/parents understand that names and initials will not be published, and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was financed in part by the Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, UFMS/MEC, Brazil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Martin JP, Bell J. A pedigree of mental defect showing sex-linkage. J Neurol Psychiatry 1943;6:154-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Lubs HA. A marker X chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 1969;21:231-44.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hecht F, Bixenman HA. Location of FRAXD in Xq27.2. Fragile sites on the X chromosome. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1990;49:137-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Verkerk AJ, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, et al. Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell 1991;65:905-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bardoni B, Schenck A, Mandel JL. The fragile X mental retardation protein. Brain Res Bull 2001;56:375-82.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sutcliffe JS, Nelson DL, Zhang F, Pieretti M, Caskey CT, Saxe D, et al. DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1992;1:397-400.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Coffee B, Zhang F, Warren ST, Reines D. Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells. Nat Genet 1999;22:98-101.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ashley CT Jr., Wilkinson KD, Reines D, Warren ST. FMR1 protein: Conserved RNP family domains and selective RNA binding. Sci 1993;262:563-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Huber KM. The fragile X-cerebellum connection. Trends Neurosci 2006;29:183-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Turner G, Webb T, Wake S, Robinson H. Prevalence of fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1996;64:196-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Warren ST, Nelson DL. Advances in molecular analysis of fragile X syndrome. JAMA 1994;271:536-42.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Oostra BA, Willems PJ, Verkerk AJ. Fragile X syndrome: A growing gene. In: Davies KE, Tilghman SM, editors. Genome Analysis: Genome Mapping and Neurological Disorders. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. p. 45-75.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Boyle L, Kaufmann WE. The behavioral phenotype of FMR1 mutations. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2010;154C: 469-76.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Green D, Flanagan D. Understanding the autistic dental patient. Gen Dent 2008;56:167-71.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Friedlander AH, Yagiela JA, Paterno VI, Mahler ME. The neuropathology, medical management and dental implications of autism. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1517-27.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Casamassimo PS, Mcllvaine WB, Hagerman R, Shellhart WC. General anesthesia and fragile X syndrome: Report of a case. Anesth Prog 1985;32:104-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Orellana LM, Silvestre FJ, Martínez-Sanchis S, Martínez-Mihi V, Bautista D. Oral manifestations in a group of adults with autism spectrum disorder. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e415-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Loo CY, Graham RM, Hughes CV. The caries experience and behavior of dental patients with autism spectrum disorder. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1518-24.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Namal N, Vehit HE, Koksal S. Do autistic children have higher levels of caries? A cross-sectional study in Turkish children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25:97-102.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
20.
Mesibov GB, Shea V. The TEACCH Program in the era of evidence-based practice. J Autism Dev Disord 2010;40:570-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Williams KR. The Son-Rise Program intervention for autism: Prerequisites for evaluation. Autism 2006;10:86-102.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ganz JB, Davis JL, Lund EM, Goodwyn FD, Simpson RL. Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: Investigation of targeted versus non-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase. Res Develop Disabil 2012;33:406-18.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Zink AG, Diniz MB, Rodrigues Dos Santos MT, Guaré RO. Use of a picture exchange communication system for preventive procedures in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Pilot study. Spec Care Dentist 2016;36:254-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Orellana LM, Martínez-Sanchis S, Silvestre FJ. Training adults and children with an autism spectrum disorder to be compliant with a clinical dental assessment using a TEACCH-based approach. J Autism Dev Disord 2014;44:776-85.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, Aronson JK, von Schoen-Angerer T, Tugwell P, et al. CARE guidelines for case reports: Explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;89:218-35.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Thiemann-Bourque K, Brady N, McGuff S, Stump K, Naylor A. Picture exchange communication system and pals: A peer-mediated augmentative and alternative communication intervention for minimally verbal preschoolers with autism. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2016;59:1133-45.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Ferreira R, Passos VB, Greghi SL, Rezende ML, Sant'Ana AC, Zangrando MS, et al. Down's Syndrome Patients Behavior Has No Correlation to Periodontal Disease. Annals of 93rd General Session of IADR; 2015. p. 4300.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Virues-Ortega J, Julio FM, Pastor-Barriuso R. The TEACCH Program for children and adults with autism: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33:940-53.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Waldron C, Nunn J, Phadraig CM, Comiskey C, Guerin S, van Harten MT, et al. Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;5:CD012628.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
McGrath C, Zhou N, Wong HM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of dental plaque control among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2019;32:522-32.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Kalf-Scholte SM, van der Weijden GA, Bakker E, Slot DE. Plaque removal with triple-headed vs single-headed manual toothbrushes – A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2018;16:13-23.  Back to cited text no. 31
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
     Introduction
     Case Report
     Discussion
     Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed453    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal