|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 83-85
Proposal of a minimally invasive approach diagnosing desquamative gingivitis-associated diseases
Marco Túllio Brazao-Silva1, Lioney Nobre Cabral2, Tiago Novaes Pinheiro2
1 Department of Dentistry, Montes Claros State University, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil
2 Department of Dentistry, Amazonas State University, Manaus, AM, Brazil
|Date of Submission||03-Feb-2020|
|Date of Decision||18-Aug-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Sep-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||7-Jan-2021|
Marco Túllio Brazao-Silva
Centro De Ciências Biológicas E Da Saúde - Faculdade De Odontologia (Prédio 6). Av. Rui Barbosa, No. 126, Bairro Vila Mauriceia, CEP 39401-088, Montes Claros, MG
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: We aimed to present a minimally invasive clinical approach to collect a suitable sample for the laboratory diagnosis of desquamative gingivitis. Materials and Methods: The proposed technique involves Nikolsky's test for the collection of tissue samples. It consists of the histopathological analysis of the bullous membrane formed in cases with positive Nikolsky's sign (NS). Three patients without a previous diagnosis of the disease agreed to undergo this protocol before a biopsy. Results: The diagnoses of the three cases reported here were mucous pemphigoid (MP), pemphigus vulgaris (PV), and lichen planus (LP). The tissue samples collected using this technique were sufficient to microscopically observe partial-thickness epithelium (diagnosing PV) or full-thickness epithelium (diagnosing MP). The diagnosis of LP was only possible by conventional biopsy. Conclusion: We observed, for different cases, some advantages of the proposed technique: minimally invasive, potentially superior to exfoliative cytology, easily performed, and with low costs.
Keywords: Benign mucosal pemphigoid, gingival diseases, lichen planus oral, oral examinations, pemphigus vulgaris
|How to cite this article:|
Brazao-Silva MT, Cabral LN, Pinheiro TN. Proposal of a minimally invasive approach diagnosing desquamative gingivitis-associated diseases. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2021;25:83-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Brazao-Silva MT, Cabral LN, Pinheiro TN. Proposal of a minimally invasive approach diagnosing desquamative gingivitis-associated diseases. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 1];25:83-5. Available from: https://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2021/25/1/83/306320
| Introduction|| |
This brief report aimed to describe a minimally invasive clinical technique to collect material for histopathological analysis and diagnosis of desquamative gingivitis (DG). To the best of our knowledge, no similar work has been published. DG is a common clinical manifestation of different diseases in the nonplaque-induced gingival periodontal disease group, as per the current classification of periodontal diseases. The current gold standard method for the final diagnosis of these diseases in dental practice is the incisional biopsy. The great resistance among most dentists and even patients is well known when it comes to biopsy, which can be a result of myths, lack of knowledge, or unwillingness to perform this type of surgical procedure or to acquire specific knowledge to do it correctly., Thus, the objective of the work was to introduce a minimally invasive, reproducible, and easily performed technique that may be useful for the histopathologic diagnosis of diseases that commonly manifest as DG. At this point, the technique should not be a replacement to biopsy, but it appears as a promising alternative for use in campaigns and early diagnosis when clinical situations require the postponement of a conventional biopsy.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The included patients spontaneously sought dental care at the oral medicine service of the authors' institution. Inclusion criteria comprised patients without previous diagnosis and with clinical manifestation of DG. Three cases of patients who agreed to perform this minimally invasive procedure before having the results of their general presurgical exams were illustrated here. This protocol was approved by the ethics committee (document 3.776.075).
Nikolsky's test is performed using a needleless plastic syringe to promote negative pressure on a single region of oral mucosa near a desquamative/erythematous area. After a few seconds of observation, the mucosa may manifest a blister, desquamation, or just erythema with small wound lining the contact with the syringe. Once a blister or desquamation occurs after the negative pressure, the next step is to remove the “pellicle” of desquamated tissue with tweezers, and then place it on a stiff paper before taking the set to a bottle with formaldehyde (or Michel's transport if requesting immunofluorescence).
| Results|| |
[Figure 1] shows the DG cases diagnosed using the proposed minimally invasive technique. In the first case, a 34-year-old female patient presented to the service complaining about gum bleeding on brushing in the last 4 months. In the second case, a 33-year-old female patient reported 1 year of unsuccessful gingivitis treatment. On physical examination, we also find ulcerative skin lesions on their dorsum and abdomen. In the third case, a 39-year-old woman presented with melanotic lip stains; bleeding gums; and small, white reticulated lines near the gingival mucosa. All the collected samples were submitted to microscopic evaluation after paraffin inclusion, with 3-μm slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The diagnoses were mucous pemphigoid (MP), pemphigus vulgaris (PV), and lichen planus (LP) for the first, second, and third cases, respectively.
|Figure 1: (a-e) A case of mucous membrane pemphigoid; (a) ulcerative cutaneous lesions at the pectoral region; (b) desquamation and ulcerative pictures involving the marginal gingiva; (c) applying negative pressure to evaluate Nikolsky's sign; (d) the desquamative tissue after positive Nikolsky's sign was removed with tweezers and wrapped to immerse in formalin solution; (e) histologic view showing an epithelium with all layers preserved, compatible with mucous membrane pemphigoid; (f and g) a case of pemphigus vulgaris; (f) desquamative epithelium obtained with the negative pressure with the plastic syringe; (g) histologic view of the epithelium with acantholytic Tzank cells compatible with pemphigus vulgaris; (h and i) a case of lichen planus; (h) the circular alteration induced by syringe not resulted in desquamation but was sufficient to collect smears tapped directly on glass slides; (i) cytological view showing multiple inflammatory cells and a little amount of epithelial cells, requiring complementary biopsy which posteriorly confirmed lichen planus|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
DG is a nonspecific periodontal manifestation characterized by erythema, desquamation, and ulceration of gingival mucosa, sometimes accompanied by lesions in other oral or even extraoral regions. Patients usually report a sensation of scaling of the gums, with variable levels of pain. Upon clinical examination, the professional will notice in DG cases that the gingiva is altered, mainly due to the appearance of edema and erythema. Areas of ulceration and flaking may or may not be seen. Therefore, in many cases, DG may mimic common periodontal diseases, such as gingivitis and periodontitis. Semiotics using Nikolsky's test will be essential for the examination in the face of complaints of DG, especially if an appropriate biofilm control is already installed. DG is present in 35% –48% of all cases of MP, 24% –45% of LP, and 3% –15% of PV (Al Abeedi et al., 2015). These epidemiological data are used to justifying the mandatory inclusion of these diseases in clinical evaluation concerning the DG picture. Other conditions such as desquamation in reaction to toothpaste, contact with allergens (e.g., cinnamon gums), and lichenoid reactions (e.g., against amalgam restoration) must also manifest as DG. In such cases, an appropriate anamnesis and the removal of possible local irritants can quickly eliminate these suspicions. If the desquamative and symptomatic picture persists, the suspicion of LP, PV, and MMP will become greater.
The tissue sample obtained for analysis using the proposed technique does not represent a conventional biopsy due to its limited extension to the epithelium. On the other hand, epithelial cells remain in an architectural arrangement that allows for a superior microscopic evaluation looking for the diagnosis, with advantages over the exfoliative cytology, which represents the other noninvasive method currently available as an alternative to biopsy. The collected material also allows a better comprehension of the relationship among the epithelial cells as compared to cytological smears. Some authors have incisively showed the inefficacy of cytology diagnosing DG.
It is noteworthy that the proposed diagnostic method has not been published yet, and, despite its simplicity, it should be clarified to the pathologist who will receive the material. Thus, to use this proposed minimally invasive method, clinicians need to provide precise information to pathologists regarding the collected sample and the desired analysis. The technique provides a small tissue sample, but it is sufficient for the diagnosis when correctly processed. At the laboratory, this “pellicle” should be carefully included with its lateral facing down so that it is possible to assess under microscopy if there is a full-thickness epithelium, with a preserved basal layer (MMP), or if there is a partial-thickness epithelium with Tzank cells (PV). Cases with negative Nikolsky's sign (does not bubble or flayed after testing) require conventional intervention, which consists of incisional biopsy [like observed in [Figure 1]h and [Figure 1]i that can only be performed under the technical conditions of a surgical procedure and availability of surgical materials.
The biopsy is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of oral diseases that manifest DG, and all cases presented here were further evaluated with a biopsy to didactically confirm the initial diagnosis indorsing this minimally invasive method. Biopsy will be necessary for LP and for all cases where Nikolsky's test did not blister. The biopsy is usually performed in the perilesional regions to avoid a region without epithelium. The proposed technique is also performed on the margin of ulcerated or erythematous areas, thus ensuring the existence of epithelium in the region. The conjunct of microscopic epithelial findings is required and sufficient for the diagnosis of PV and MMP. Thus, the minimally invasive method proposed here is promising, with some advantages over conventional biopsy: ease making and minimal trauma, not being restricted by systemic conditions unfavorable to surgery, or lack of material for surgical procedures. It is also possible to apply direct immunofluorescence to the samples, which is an advanced laboratory evaluation that evidences the relationship between autoantibodies and epithelial cells. On the other hand, if the sample is not well packaged and the laboratory procedure is performed delicately, the work may be lost and the sample will be insufficient for diagnosis.
| Conclusion|| |
The proposed method seems to be an ancillary in-office approach, which is simple, quick, and minimally invasive, with possible application in daily consult, teaching, campaigns, and for patients with local or systemic immediate restrictions for surgery (biopsy). The proposed way of collecting material for histopathological examination is likely to allow more dentists and doctors to advance in the diagnostic evaluation of DGs. This procedure might provide a better sample for microscopic evaluation than cytology smears. The sampling of the membranous tissue that would be discarded after the Nikolsky's test, promotes a good chance of diagnosis without the need for a subsequent biopsy, feasible when diagnosing diseases such as PV and MMP. Thus, favoring early diagnosis and early intervention, reducing patient suffering, and improving the prognosis. These are promising preliminary results, and we expect that once this technique is applied in a broad number of cases, additional data about its sensitivity and specificity will be provided.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the legal guardian has given his consent for images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The guardian understands that names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Holmstrup P, Plemons J, Meyle J. Non-plaque-induced gingival diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2018;45:28-43.
Anandani C, Metgud R, Ramesh G, Singh K. Awareness of general dental practitioners about oral screening and biopsy procedures in Udaipur, India. Oral Health Prev Dent 2015;13:523-30.
Seoane J, Varela-Centelles P, Esparza-Gómez G, Cerero-Lapiedra R, Seoane-Romero JM, Diz P. Simulation for training in oral cancer biopsy: A surgical model and feedback from GDPs. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal 2013;18:e246-50.
Highfield J. Diagnosis and classification of periodontal disease. Aust Dent J 2009;54:11-26.
Endo H, Rees TD, Kuyama K, Matsue M, Yamamoto H. Use of oral exfoliative cytology to diagnose desquamative gingivitis: A pilot study. Quintessence Int 2008;39:e152-61.