Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 866  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout


 
   Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 411-417  

Functionally graded membrane: A novel approach in the treatment of gingival recession defects


1 Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, Ambala, Haryana, India
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Ambala, Haryana, India
3 Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Himachal Dental College, Sunder Nagar, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, India
4 Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences, Chandigarh, India

Date of Submission07-Aug-2020
Date of Decision02-Apr-2021
Date of Acceptance18-May-2021
Date of Web Publication01-Sep-2021

Correspondence Address:
Megha Takiar
IF 56/3, DLF New Town Heights, Sector 86, Gurugram, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_583_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Guided tissue regeneration has recently been advocated in re-constructing soft-tissue dimensions in recession defects. Advancement in nanotechnology has led to increased zest for approaches such as electrospinning of biologically active; nanofibrous functionally graded regenerative membranes for periodontal tissue engineering. A functionally graded membrane (FGM) had been tailored by incorporating chitosan and nano-hydroxyapatite over Amnion membrane and used in gingival recession defects. Study Design: It was single-blind, randomized controlled study. Split-mouth study was conducted in nine patients and 22 sites with recession defects were selected. Sites were divided into Group A (Amnion membrane with coronal advanced flap) and Group B (FGM with coronal advanced flap). Materials and Methods: Sites were assessed clinically by recording plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), vertical recession defect depth (VRDD), relative clinical attachment level (CAL), and width of keratinized tissue at baseline, 3–6 months; and radiographically by recording linear bone growth by dentascan at baseline and 6 months. Result: Both groups showed statistically significant reduction in PI, GI and VRDD, and CAL and nonsignificant reduction in width of keratinized tissue at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Group A showed statistically significant linear bone growth at 6 months. Group B also showed gain in linear bone growth at 6 months; however, result was statistically nonsignificant. Conclusion: FGM had shown favorable results by enhancing bone growth while preventing the gingival tissue downgrowth.

Keywords: Amnion, membrane, recession


How to cite this article:
Dhawan S, Takiar M, Manocha A, Dhawan R, Malhotra R, Gupta J. Functionally graded membrane: A novel approach in the treatment of gingival recession defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2021;25:411-7

How to cite this URL:
Dhawan S, Takiar M, Manocha A, Dhawan R, Malhotra R, Gupta J. Functionally graded membrane: A novel approach in the treatment of gingival recession defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 27];25:411-7. Available from: https://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2021/25/5/411/325007




   Introduction Top


Gingival recession represents a condition in which the management is needed to address both biological and esthetic demands. The main goal should not be only to attain complete root coverage but also to regenerate the lost periodontal structures to minimize the chances of relapse of gingival recession. Thus, guided tissue regeneration (GTR) technique has been implicated to create the space for regenerating periodontal ligament cells to regenerate bone and attachment apparatus and prevent the down growth of migrating epithelial cells.[1]

Amnion is a thin and innermost lining of amniotic sac. The preserved human amniotic membrane is an innovative biomaterial that has abundant growth factors and stem cells that aids in hastening healing of wound with periodontal regeneration.[2] It is rich in collagen (Type I, IV, V, and VI), proteoglycans and glycoproteins like laminin and fibronectin.[3] It has exquisite properties like anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory that further enhances its utility.

Degradable membranes such as amnion membrane have the advantage of elimination of second surgical site as required in nonresorbable membranes, but the mechanical strength of such membranes is typically low and is difficult to maintain space underneath for regeneration of bone. Grafts are used underneath to maintain space and to prevent falling of membrane on the bone defect. It has been observed that cells adhere better on the fibers whose dimension is below their own. Thus, a GTR membrane will be preferred that contains bone graft and growth factors, whose dimensions comprise of nanometer-diameter protein fibers and have better mechanically properties.

Therefore, functionally graded three-layered membrane was tailored by electrospinning (e-spinning) Chitosan/Nano-hydroxyapatite over amnion membrane. It comprises of nanoparticles and resembles natural extracellular matrix (ECM).[4],[5] Such a composite scaffold can stimulate healing, permits diffusion of materials across the membrane, stimulates formation of bone, and has good mechanical strength.[6],[7]

Thus, an attempt had been made to evaluate the regenerative potential of functionally graded membrane (FGM) and to compare it with Amnion membrane in recession defects.


   Materials and Methods Top


Patient selection

Twenty-two sites in nine patients (eight males and one female) with gingival recession were selected. The selected sample size was based on the assessment of studies conducted earlier and the expected mean differences. The power of the study was fixed at 80% and error was fixed at 5%.

Patients were selected between the age group of 30–55 years, with buccal/labial vertical gingival recession defects more than or equal to 2 mm. Only co-operative and motivated patients committed to oral hygiene were selected. Patients with previous history of any periodontal treatment in last 6 months, any systemic ailment, smokers, chronic alcoholics, and pregnant and lactating females were excluded. This study was carried out according to revised Helsinki declaration (2013) and approved by ethical committee constituted by the institution. Patients signed the consent form enclosing detailed description of risks and benefits of the treatment.

Study design

Sites with gingival recession were divided randomly into Group A and Group B in a split-mouth design, such that each patient received treatment by both the membranes.

Group A

In 11 sites, amnion membrane was placed with coronally repositioned flap.

Group B

In 11 sites, FGM was placed with coronally repositioned flap.

Amnion membrane used in the study was procured from tissue bank in Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India [Figure 1]. FGM had been fabricated by e-spinning chitosan and nano-hydroxyapatite over Amnion membrane at IIT, Roorkee by multilayering spinning[8] [Figure 1]. It consisted of a core layer (Amnion membrane) and two functional surface layers (SLs) interfacing bone (nano-hydroxyapatite) and epithelium (chitosan).
Figure 1: Amnionmembraneandfunctionallygradedmembrane

Click here to view


Assessment of clinical parameters was carried out using custom-made occlusal acrylic stents at baseline before the periodontal therapy and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The clinical parameters included plaque index (PI),[9] gingival index (GI),[10] relative clinical attachment level (from lower/apical/lower limit of occlusal stent to bottom of the pocket using University of North Carolina-15 [UNC-15] periodontal probe) (Relative attachment level [RAL]),[11] position of gingival margin/vertical recession defect depth (VRDD) (from the apical/lower most part of occlusal stent to free gingival margin using a UNC-15 periodontal probe) (VRDD),[12] and width of keratinized tissue[13] (from gingival margin at the deepest part of recession to the mucogingival [MG] junction).

Radiographic assessment at baseline and 6 months was done using computed tomography (CT) Dentascan imaging. Linear bone fill was measured as distance from the apical most end of cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to crest of buccal radicular bone.

Clinical procedure

After the completion of Phase I therapy, patients were subjected to surgical procedure. Adequate local anesthesia at the selected site was obtained. Two horizontal incisions were made from the line angles of involved tooth at a distance of 1 mm more than vertical depth of the recession from the tip of anatomical papilla. These incisions should not bisect the gingival margins of adjacent teeth. An intrasulcular (crevicular) incision was given joining the two horizontal incisions. Oblique releasing incisions were given on either side to release the pedicle flap. The resulting full-thickness trapezoidal flap was raised till the MG junction. It was followed by sharp dissection to obtain a split-thickness flap beyond MG junction to attain a freely movable flap. Coronal advancement was made possible by removing all muscle insertions. Fresh connective tissue beds were created by careful de-epithelization of the inter-dental papillae. The root planning of the involved surfaces was done with curettes.

Both membranes were cut to the desired dimensions to cover the defect area extending 2–3 mm onto the bone. Group A was treated with amnion membrane and Group B with FGM [Figure 2], [Figure 3]. Flap was then coronally repositioned to wholly cover the membrane and sutured 1 mm coronal to CEJ. The flap was secured with direct interrupted sutures on the vertical incision line and sling suture for the papilla by 4-0 nonresorbable silk sutures. Surgical site was protected by the placement of the periodontal pack (coe-pak). Patients were advised proper postoperative instructions. Amoxicillin 500 mg and Diclofenac potassium were prescribed thrice daily each for 5 days. 0.12% chlorohexidine was also advised for 2 weeks to be used twice daily.
Figure 2: Group-Aplacementofamnionmembraneongingivalrecessiononcanine

Click here to view
Figure 3: Group B placement of functionally graded membrane on gingival recession on canine

Click here to view


One week postsurgically, sutures and pack were removed followed by irrigation of the surgical site. Patients were then periodically monitored at 3 and 6 months after surgery [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7].
Figure 4: Group-Averticalrecessiondefectdepthatbaseline

Click here to view
Figure 5: Group-Averticalrecessiondefectdepthat6monthspostoperatively

Click here to view
Figure 6: Group-B vertical recession defect depth at baseline

Click here to view
Figure 7: Group-B vertical recession defect depth at 6 months

Click here to view


On recall visits, oral hygiene was evaluated and related instructions were reinforced.

Statistical analysis

The arithmetic mean and standard deviation for the requisite assessment intervals were calculated. For intragroup variations, “Independent t-test” and for inter-group variations “Paired t-test” was done.


   Results Top


Patients showed satisfactory oral hygiene, with no signs of complications at the operated sites. For both the groups, the mean difference of PI, GI, VRDD, and RAL at 3 and 6 months from baseline was statistically highly significant (P < 0.01), whereas the mean difference from 3 months to 6 months was statistically nonsignificant (P > 0.05). The mean difference in the width of keratinized tissue at all the three time intervals was statistically nonsignificant (P > 0.05) in both the groups.

On comparison between the two groups, the mean difference of PI, GI, VRDD, RAL, and width of keratinized tissue at all the three time intervals were statistically nonsignificant (P > 0.05) [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Table 1: Intergroup comparison of mean differences of plaque index and gingival index at various intervals

Click here to view
Table 2: Intergroup comparison of mean differences of vertical defect depth, relative clinical attachment level and width of keratinized tissue at various intervals

Click here to view


For Group A, the mean difference of linear bone fill from baseline to 6 months was 0.16 ± 0.18 that was statistically significant (P < 0.05); for Group B it was 0.11 ± 0.27, that was statistically nonsignificant (P > 0.05).

On comparison of linear bone fill between two groups, the mean difference from baseline to 6 months was 0.051 that was statistically nonsignificant (P > 0.05) [Table 3] and [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11].
Figure 8: GroupA-Linearboneatbaseline

Click here to view
Figure 9: GroupA-Linearboneat6months

Click here to view
Figure 10: Group B - Linear bone at baseline

Click here to view
Figure 11: Group B - Linear bone at 6 months

Click here to view
Table 3: Intergroup comparison of mean differences of linear bone growth at various intervals

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Coronal flap repositioning had shown to be a predictable technique that produce satisfactory results for coverage of denuded root surface as shown by Wennström and Zucchelli.[14] Moreover, donor site morbidity is prevented in comparison to free gingival graft and connective tissue grafts. The technique used in the present study as advocated by Pini Prato et al.[15] was preferred over the conventional coronal flap repositioning technique, as the former did not affect the marginal tissues of adjacent teeth, thus minimizing the chances of postoperative recession.

Currently, numerous biomaterials (membranes and grafts) are being used along with coronally repositioned periodontal flap to augment the results of root coverage procedure.

In the present study, two different types of membranes had been compared due to their unique properties. Amnion membrane comprises of various matrix proteins such as laminin, fibronectin, and collagen that helps in cellular migration and proliferation. It is also composed of various signaling molecules such as epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-β1, and fibroblastic growth factor. Favorable results had been shown with Amnion membranes by Gurinsky[16] in root coverage procedures, Wallace[17] in guided bone regeneration (GBR).

FGM has a nanofibrous structure that has advantage of high number of molecules on the surface that speed up positive interaction between cells and ECM, angiogenesis, differentiation of stem cells, support three-dimensional matrix adhesion and stimulate cell-signaling pathways required to achieve tissue regeneration.

Chitosan, a cationic natural biopolymer of N-acetyl glucosamine, is a structural component found in the glycosaminoglycans. Its cationic nature is responsible for attracting various negative charged proteoglycans. This suggests that chitosan may interact with growth factors, thus enhancing the healing property by the stimulation of fibroblasts and osteogenic differentiation.[18] Chitosan layer had been placed interfacing epithelial tissues as it had been shown to act as seal to prevent junctional epithelium from falling into the defect site and hence maintain space for bone regeneration.[19] It also exhibits biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity, and antibacterial properties.[6],[7] Being positively charged, chitosan combines with negatively charged red blood cells, thus quickly forming blood clot and shortening the homeostasis time.

Nanohydroxyapatite SL had been placed interfacing bone as it possesses exceptional biocompatibility and bioactivity properties with respect to bone cells and tissues, probably due to its structural similarity with the bone and being osteoconductive, is capable of forming a direct chemical bond with surrounding hard tissues. It improves mechanical strength of the membrane while maintaining its high porosity and microstructure. There is a possible interaction between the NH2 group and primary and secondary −OH group of chitosan with Ca2+ (metal coordination interaction) of nanohydroxyapatite responsible for the higher mechanical strength of the composite scaffold.

Nowadays, ternary systems with superior regenerative properties are getting immense attention as compared to binary systems like chitosan and HA scaffolds, by introducing components like growth factors.[20] Thus, in the present study, membrane has been fabricated comprising of chitosan, nano-hydroxyapatite and amnion membrane.

There is a paucity of literature regarding the use of these membranes in the field of periodontics. Noh et al.[21] suggested better wound healing with nanofibrous chitin as compared to microfibrous chitin. Baek et al.[22] supported the use of chitosan/hydroxyapatite membrane on new bone formation for GBR.

In this study, sites were selected where VRDD was greater than or equal to 2 mm. This was in accordance with Balaji et al.[23] where such recession defects were treated with successful results.

Dentascan is a CT software program that allows 3-planar view of the hard tissue structures of the oral cavity. It has an added advantage of interacting with images to make measurements, manipulate images to simulate treatment and to assess bone volume and density. Gingival recession is a consequence of loss of radicular bone. Thus, linear buccal bone loss was evaluated with the help of Dentascan.

In the present study, there was statistically highly significant reduction in mean PI, GI score of both Groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively from baseline [Table 2]. These observations were in accordance with Agarwal et al.[24] who used coronally advanced flap procedure with or without Amnion membrane in gingival recession defects.

In both the Groups, no significant difference was observed between 3 and 6 months for both PI and GI [Table 2]. This might be because all patients must be complying with the oral hygiene instructions and maintaining health of the oral cavity.

The present study showed statistically highly significant reduction in mean VRDD, RAL of both Groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively [Table 3]. Ghahroudi et al.[25] observed similar results with amnion allografts along with coronally repositioned flap procedure in recession defects. These changes were due to the coronal shift of the gingival apparatus owing to the recession coverage achieved.

Statistically nonsignificant reduction in RAL was observed between 3 months and 6 months in both groups [Table 3]. It must be due to relapse of gingival margin postsurgically due to thin tissues.[26]

There was statistically nonsignificant reduction in mean width of keratinized tissue of Group A and Group B at 3 and 6 months postoperatively from baseline. Gürgan et al.[27] studied the level of MG junction after coronally advanced flap procedure over the period of 5 years. They observed that keratinized tissue showed a significant decrease in width from baseline (3.68 ± 1.17) to 12 months (2.96 ± 1.19). However, a tendency of MG junction was seen to revert at 5 years period thereby nullifying the decrease.

The present study showed statistically significant gain in linear bone growth of Group A at 6 months postoperatively. Group B had also shown gain; however, results were nonsignificant (P > 0.05) at 6 months postoperatively [Table 4]. The results were similar to Saimbi et al.[28] and Kamboj[29] who evaluated bone defect fill in human intrabony defects using Dentascan.


   Conclusion Top


The results showed the same regenerative potential of FGM and Amnion membrane. Since, this is the first reported use of FGM in periodontal defects, thus more clinical and histological studies with larger sample size and with different types of tissue engineered membranes are needed to explore the true regenerative potential of these third-generation GTR/GBR membranes, as they hold promise at solving the drawbacks of currently available membranes.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Tatakis DN, Trombelli L. Gingival recession treatment: Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2000;71:299-307.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gholami GA, Saberi A, Kadkhodazadeh M, Amid R, Karami D. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix in combination with double papillary flap for root coverage: A 6-month trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013;10:506-13.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS. Amnion membrane for coverage of gingival recession: A novel application. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:293-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG. Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: A review. Tissue Eng 2006;12:1197-211.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Reneker DH, Chun I. Nanometre diameter fibers of polymer, produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 1996;7:216.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cai ZX, Mo XM, Zhang KH, Fan LP, Yin AL, He CL, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/silk fibroin composite nanofibers for wound-dressing applications. Int J Mol Sci 2010;11:3529-39.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Jang SI, Mok JY, Jeon IH, Park KH, Nguyen TT, Park JS, et al. Effect of electro spun non-woven mats of dibutyryl chitin/poly (lactic acid) blends on wound healing in hairless mice. Molecules 2012;17:2992-3007.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bottino MC, Thomas V, Janowski GM. A novel spatially designed and functionally graded electrospun membrane for periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomater 2011;7:216-24.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Clark DC, Chin Quee T, Bergeron MJ, Chan EC, Lautar-Lemay C, de Gruchy K. Reliability of attachment level measurements using the cementoenamel junction and a plastic stent. J Periodontol 1987;58:115-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Latha TA, Sudarsan S, Arun KV, Talwar A. Root coverage in Class I gingival recession defects, combining rotated papillary pedicle graft and coronally repositioned flap, using a micro surgical approach: A clinical evaluation. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2009;13:21-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Andrade PF, Grisi MF, Marcaccini AM, Fernandes PG, Reino DM, Souza SL, et al. Comparison between micro- and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative. J Periodontol 2010;81:1572-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wennström JL, Zucchelli G. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:770-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Magnani C, Cortellini P, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession. J Periodontol 1992;63:919-28.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gurinsky B. A novel dehydrated amnion allograft for use in the treatment of gingival recession: An observational case series. J Implant Adv Clin Dent 2009;1:65-73.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wallace S. Radiographic and histomorphometric analysis of amniotic allograft tissue in ridge preservation: A case report. J Implant Adv Clin Dent 2010;2:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Chen JP, Chang GY, Chen JK. Electrospun collagen/chitosan nanofibrous membrane as wound dressing. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2008;313:183-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Qasim SB, Najeeb S, Delaine-Smith RM, Rawlinson A, Ur Rehman I. Potential of electro spun chitosan fibers as a surface layer in functionally graded GTR membrane for periodontal regeneration. Dent Mater 2017;33:71-83.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Shakir M, Jolly R, Khan MS, Rauf A, Kazmi S. Nano-hydroxyapatite/β-CD/chitosan nanocomposite for potential applications in bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2016;93:276-89.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Noh HK, Lee SW, Kim JM, Oh JE, Kim KH, Chung CP, et al. Electrospinning of chitin nanofibers: Degradation behavior and cellular response to normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Biomaterials 2006;27:3934-44.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Baek YJ, Kim JH, Song JM, Yoon SY, Kim HS, Shin SH. Chitin-fibroin-hydroxyapatite membrane for guided bone regeneration: Micro-computed tomography evaluation in a rat model. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38:14.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Balaji VR, Ramakrishnan T, Manikandan D, Lambodharan R, Karthikeyan B, Niazi TM, et al. Management of gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix graft: A clinical study. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2016;8:59-64.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
24.
Agarwal SK, Jhingran R, Bains VK, Srivastava R, Madan R, Rizvi I. Patient-centered evaluation of microsurgical management of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap with platelet-rich fibrin or amnion membrane: A comparative analysis. Eur J Dent 2016;10:121-33.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
25.
Ghahroudi AA, Khorsand A, Rokn AR, Sabounchi SS, Shayesteh YS, Soolari A. Comparison of amnion allograft with connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures: A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Int Acad Periodontol 2013;15:101-12.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Pini-Prato GP, Cairo F, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Rotundo R, Cortellini P. Coronally advanced flap versus connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A split-mouth study with a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:644-50.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gürgan CA, Oruç AM, Akkaya M. Alterations in location of the mucogingival junction 5 years after coronally repositioned flap surgery. J Periodontol 2004;75:893-901.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Saimbi CS, Gautam A, Khan MA, Nandlal. Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:331-5.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
29.
Kamboj M, Arora R, Gupta H. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft (Ostim®) and synthetic microcrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft (Osteogen®) in the treatment of human periodontal intrabony defects: A clinical and denta scan study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016;20:423-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed676    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded262    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal